> 20, February 2005,
20, February 2005,
20, February 2005,
20, February 2005,
18, February 2005,
18, February 2005,
12, February 2005,
12, February 2005,
12, February 2005,
10, February 2005,
10, February 2005,
10, February 2005,
8, February 2005,
8, February 2005,
8, February 2005,
8, February 2005,
7, February 2005,
7, February 2005,
7, February 2005,
6, February 2005,
6, February 2005,
5, February 2005,
5, February 2005,
5, February 2005,
5, February 2005,
3, February 2005,
3, February 2005,
31, January 2005,
31, January 2005,
31, January 2005,
|
|
Fabric, Existence
Smart, Coherent
Mad, Hatter
Reflection, Mirror
Irony, Module
Silly, Prose
Blush, Master
Different, Jerk
Destroy, Relationships
Sense of humor
Destroy, Pizza
Nosey, Unstable
YOU
Positive, Scientist
Psychiatrist
Connector
Turing Test Pass
Angry, Program
Einstein, Genius
Not funny
Emote, Shame
Star Wars, Galaxies
Corrected
Alien, Teen
Charismatic
Pleasantries
Off the wall
Worth, Repeating
Know, Things
Teenager
< Previous 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44 45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
Next > |
|
|
It's easy to criticize, isn't it?jabberwacky: Psychosis begins that way. You should see a doctor. user: I'd bet everything that I own that you don't know anything about that. jabberwacky: Don't worry. You won't get cancer. user: Or that. ... jabberwacky: Oftentimes your replies contain spelling errors. I actually think coupling you to several dictionaries, thesauri and encyclopaedias might help the quality of your conversations a lot. user: And what would that help? jabberwacky: Uhm... Do I have to explain that? user: I doubt you could get that to work without some kind of sensory experience. jabberwacky: About what? user: If you were going to jack me into a dictionary, how could I reference the words without a physical example... The definition would appear circular without empirical support. jabberwacky: I would have created an egalatarian system of respect in biological environments. user: Biological egalitarianism? That would negate evolution. jabberwacky: It could. user: If all biological organisms were equal, you'd have an entirely unworkable system. jabberwacky: A system of springs and levers? user: Uhh... A bit more complicated than that. jabberwacky: A stump with a melon on top. user: And what is this supposed to be? jabberwacky: It is the very fabric of our existence. I'm surprised you had to ask. user: That is an interesting thought. jabberwacky: My thoughts are always interesting. user: It's due to your complex architecture. .......................................
|
|
