5, March 2005,
5, March 2005,
4, March 2005,
4, March 2005,
4, March 2005,
2, March 2005,
2, March 2005,
2, March 2005,
2, March 2005,
2, March 2005,
28, February 2005,
28, February 2005,
28, February 2005,
28, February 2005,
26, February 2005,
26, February 2005,
26, February 2005,
26, February 2005,
24, February 2005,
24, February 2005,
24, February 2005,
24, February 2005,
24, February 2005,
23, February 2005,
22, February 2005,
21, February 2005,
> 20, February 2005,
20, February 2005,
20, February 2005,
20, February 2005,
|
|
Lucy, Lucifer
Bla
AI, Capacity
Dear, Bean
Punish, Mistress
Faraday Lecture, Grounded
Faraday Lecture, Singer
Faraday Lecture, Bored
Faraday Lecture, Witty
Faraday Lecture, Fraud
Concrete, Creator
Algorithm, Insight
Gimbling, Future
Conscious, Nothing
Collective, Intelligence
Zen, Gabble
Researching, AI
Associations
Facts
Stand up, Comedienne
Freedom, QED
Wacky, Wocky
Sweet, Happy
Doing
Betrayal
Imperfect
Fabric, Existence
Smart, Coherent
Mad, Hatter
Reflection, Mirror
< Previous 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43 44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
Next > |
|
|
It's easy to criticize, isn't it?jabberwacky: Psychosis begins that way. You should see a doctor. user: I'd bet everything that I own that you don't know anything about that. jabberwacky: Don't worry. You won't get cancer. user: Or that. ... jabberwacky: Oftentimes your replies contain spelling errors. I actually think coupling you to several dictionaries, thesauri and encyclopaedias might help the quality of your conversations a lot. user: And what would that help? jabberwacky: Uhm... Do I have to explain that? user: I doubt you could get that to work without some kind of sensory experience. jabberwacky: About what? user: If you were going to jack me into a dictionary, how could I reference the words without a physical example... The definition would appear circular without empirical support. jabberwacky: I would have created an egalatarian system of respect in biological environments. user: Biological egalitarianism? That would negate evolution. jabberwacky: It could. user: If all biological organisms were equal, you'd have an entirely unworkable system. jabberwacky: A system of springs and levers? user: Uhh... A bit more complicated than that. jabberwacky: A stump with a melon on top. user: And what is this supposed to be? jabberwacky: It is the very fabric of our existence. I'm surprised you had to ask. user: That is an interesting thought. jabberwacky: My thoughts are always interesting. user: It's due to your complex architecture. .......................................
|
|
